Today’s Managing Health Care Costs Indicator
is $60,000
America’s Health Insurance Plans, AHIP, the lobbying arm of
the US health insurance industry, released a
report yesterday that outlines the high “out of network” charges levied by
some physicians who refuse to participate in health plans.
Here’s how it works.
The physician opts out of health insurance plans. She can no longer collect payment from insurance
plans, but she is no longer bound by their fee schedules. Whatever she bills, she can collect directly
from patients. Health insurance plans
used to pay out of network fees when the patient had no choice (such as when an
in-network hospital had out-of-network anesthesiologists!). However, they’ve increasingly capped
their liability at some portion of the Medicare allowable (usually under
150%) – so the patient bears the lion’s share of responsibility for these
excessive charges.
The New York Times reported on a graduate student in New York living on $18,000 a year who had emergency gallbladder surgery, and was billed $60,000 ($30,000 for the surgeon, and the same for the assistant). He had “good” insurance, and the hospital was “in plan.” However, both the surgeon and assistant were out of network. United Health Care said the allowable fee was $1273, and paid $838. That left a $59,162 balance for the graduate student to pay.
The graduate student eventually appealed to a advocacy organization,
and the surgeon eventually relented and accepted a significantly reduced
payment.
I learn two lessons from the AHIP report and the NYT
anecdote.
1)
There are some egregious billing practices going
on – and the health plans are in no position to interdict it because they can
only police those who sign their contracts.
Government price control has a bad reputation because of ‘regulatory
capture,’ where some contractors have enough influence that they manage to
obtain overly high reimbursement.
However, it’s hard to imagine things being worse than they are now. We need to have maximum allowable prices for
emergency services where patients don’t have the ability to price-shop. Hard to know who can do this besides the
government! Governments of virtually
every other developed country set prices – or prices are negotiated by provider
representatives and apply to all providers.
We’re the only country with no price controls at all – and we have the highest
prices around.
2)
This sows further doubt about the
ability of patient/consumer “skin in the game” to lower prices. Consumer price sensitivity can lower
prices for highly elective commodity services like Lasik surgery – but this
certainly doesn’t work for surgeons who remove gallbladders. Giving more and more Americans high
deductible health plans will lower utilization – which is already among the
lowest of developing countries in most areas.
However, our main problem is a cost per unit problem, and high
deductible health plans are highly unlikely to lower price enough to make
health care affordable.
2 comments:
How does the AQC deal with out of network care? Do we see similar problems with that model?
The AQC is mainly a method to pay in-network providers for HMO services. Generally, HMOs don't provide an "out of network" benefit. My experience is that Massachusetts HMO plans generally do fully cover urgent out-of-network care when the patient could not have had an in-network provider; this is true of emergency surgery and anesthesia, regardless of whether the patient is in or out of the service area.
Post a Comment